Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Robert Spano, President, ��������� Julia Laffranque, ��������� Işıl Karakaş, ��������� Neboj�a Vučinić, ��������� Paul Lemmens, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar,
The case originated in five applications (nos. 57818/10 , 57822/10, 57825/10, 57827/10, 57829/10) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by five Turkish nationals, Mr Tibet Menteş, Mr Atilla Kantar, Mr Birol Arısoy, Mr Rahmi Aydoğmuş and Mr Muhammed Erkan G�neri (�the applicants�), on 9 August 2010.
The applicants were represented by Ahmet Okyay, a lawyer practising in İzmir. The Turkish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.