Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
���� Mark Villiger, President, ���� Angelika Nu�berger, ���� Ann Power-Forde, ���� Vincent A. De Gaetano, ���� Andr� Potocki, ���� Helena J�derblom, judges, ���� Myroslava Antonovych, ad hoc judge,
. The case originated in an application (no. 40514/06 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Igor Mikhaylovich Rudyak (�the applicant�), on 26 September 2006.
. The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr Ye. Gryn, a lawyer practising in the town of Gadyach, Ukraine. The Ukrainian Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, most recently, Ms Nataly Sevostianova , of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.