Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal - ECSC Treaty - Rejection of a complaint alleging discriminatory pricing and unreasonable royalties - Powers of the Commission)
appellants, APPEALS against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 7 February 2001 in Case T-89/98 NALOO v Commission [2001] ECR II-515 , seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: National Association of Licensed Opencast Operators (NALOO) , established in Newcastle upon Tyne (United Kingdom), represented by M. Hoskins, barrister, instructed by A. Dowie, solicitor, with an address for service in Luxembourg, applicant at first instance, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: M. Wathelet, President of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, P. Jann (Rapporteur) and A. Rosas, Judges, Advocate General: S. Alber, Registrar: L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator,
This letter which sets out a Commission decision deals with certain aspects [of the 1990 complaint] ... . It deals with the position in England and Wales, in the light of the new situation arising from the entry into operation of the ... supply contracts between [BC], [IP] and [PG] on 1 April 1990. Other issues, particularly those regarding the situation ... before 1 April 1990 ... are not dealt with.
The grounds of appeal concerning the assessment by the Court of First Instance of the Commission's powers - Arguments of the parties
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.