Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
AND IN THE MATTER OF A AND B See also: X (Number 4: Religious Differences: Shared Care) [2019] EWFC B81 (11 September 2019) X (Number 2 : Orthodox Schools) [2015] EWFC B237 (9 May 2015) X (Number 1 : Religious Differences : Schools) [2014] EWFC B230 (4 November 2014)
For father � Jessica Bernstein (counsel) instructed direct access by the father For mother � Ruth Kirby (counsel) instructed by Guile Nicholas Solicitors For children: Richard O Sullivan (counsel) instructed by Creightons Solicitors
ii. For Sunday contact for 3 hours on the intervening weekends during term time;
"..I have less confidence than I did in November in the father's ability to stop himself from exposing the children to different experiences, experiences which he values and wishes to share with the children but which carry the risks of confusion and difficulty that I identified in my [2014] judgment."
"This is deeply troubling because this is the atmosphere and these are the views within which the children are being raised. At present they are too young to know of and to understand, but unless the mother can protect them from exposure to this negative community opinion about their father they will face a damaging conflict when trying to maintain a close positive relationship with him."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.