Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Andrew Powell (instructed by Mills & Reeve) for the Applicant The First Respondent did not attend and was not represented Eva Holland of CAFCASS Legal for the Second Respondent Hearing date: 28th January 2025 Judgment: 2nd April 2025 ____________________
(1) The absence of effective consent in accordance with s 54A (5) HFEA 2008 from Ms S, more than 6 weeks after the birth of G.
(1)On an application made by one person ("the applicant"), the court may make an order providing for a child to be treated in law as the child of the applicant if�
(a)the child has been carried by a woman who is not the applicant, as a result of the placing in her of an embryo or sperm and eggs or her artificial insemination,
(b)the gametes of the applicant were used to bring about the creation of the embryo, and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.