Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
a. The law in relation to appealing a financial remedies arbitration award is found in Haley v Haley [2020] EWCA Civ 1369 , per King LJ (para 73):
b. It flows from that that the first test a challenge to a financial remedies arbitral award must meet is whether there is a "real prospect of success" or where there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard (FPR 30.3(7)).
c. If that test is met, then permission can be given for a hearing at which the appellate test is whether the determination was "wrong" or "unjust because of a serious procedural or other irregularity" (FPR 30.12(3)). Those propositions as to the legal tests at each stage were supported by Peel J in G v G [2022] EWFC 151 at paragraphs 2 and 3.
e. At paragraph 25 Peel J said in relation to financial remedies and children matters,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.