Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr David Wolfson�Q.C. and�Mr Simon Gilson�(instructed by�Hogan Lovells International LLP) for the�Claimant Mr Toby Landau�Q.C. and�Mr Siddharth Dhar�(instructed by�Stephenson Harwood LLP) for the�Defendants Hearing dates: 29th and 30th June 2015 ____________________
It is alleged breaches of Article 7 that found the counterclaims brought by D1 and D3 referred to below.
Part 2 of Schedule 3 provided, amongst other things, that C would continue to carry on its activities in accordance with the PSC.
a) an amendment to the SPA was executed, varying in certain respects the conditions for completion;
b) D2 executed three separate company guarantees ("the Guarantees") in favour of C, two of which guaranteed, subject to a financial limit, D1's payment obligations under the SPA; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.