Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Deirdre Fottrell QC (instructed by Russell Cooke) for the Applicants Ms Sharon Segal (instructed by Goodman Ray) for the 3rd Respondent The 1st and 2nd Respondents did not attend Hearing date: 22nd March 2022 Judgment: 5th April 2022 ____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT: 5TH APRIL 2022 HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT APPROVED ____________________
(1) The biological connection with at least one of the applicants and the child, and the child was not carried by one of the applicants (s54(1)(a) and (b)).
(2) Whether the applicants at the time of the application and at the time when the court is considering making an order are married, civil partners or in an enduring family relationship (s54 (2)).
(3) The application should be made within six months of the child's birth (s54(3)).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.