Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open Competition EUIPO/AD/01/17 - Article 266 TFEU - Decision to award financial compensation adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Measures necessary to comply with a judgment delivered in an action for annulment - Unlimited jurisdiction - Liability )
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by A. Lukošiūtė and E. Lekan, acting as Agents,
composed of O. Porchia, President, P. Nihoul (Rapporteur) and S. Verschuur, Judges,
having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, ZR, seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2021 by which it awarded her a sum of EUR 5 000 in compliance with the judgment of 13 January 2021, ZR v EUIPO (T-610/18, not published, EU:T:2021:5 ; ‘the contested decision’), and, if necessary, EUIPO’s decision of 28 June 2022 rejecting her complaint (‘the decision rejecting the complaint’) and, secondly, compensation for the damage she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.