Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment was delivered in private.� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.� Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
                    This is an application made by FA for a child arrangements order and a prohibited steps order. A is the only child of the relationship between FA and MA.� A is four years old.
                    The issues for the court are, first, what are the best arrangements for A to spend their time between their parents? Secondly should there be a prohibition on MA taking A out of the UK? �Thirdly, should there be an order for MA to surrender her and A�s passports?
                    FA�s application was made in December 2017. There have been final hearings listed in each of the subsequent years, all of which were adjourned for further work and exploration of contact.
                    FA has been represented at this hearing by Hannah Whitehouse of counsel on a direct access basis. He has been represented at every hearing, usually by Giorgia Sessi of counsel, although he has been acting as a litigant in person since November 2020.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.