Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
IN T HE MA TTE R OF AN A PPL IC A T ION B Y � S� F OR LE AVE T O A P PL Y F OR J UDI C IAL RE VI EW
AND I N T HE MA TTE R OF A D E C I S ION B Y T HE U PPE R T R I B UNAL (IMMIG R A T ION A ND A SY L UM C H A M BER ) T O REF U S E P E R MI SS I ON T O A PPE AL T O I TSEL F MADE O N 8 N O V E M B E R 20 1 6
[1] T hi s a ppli c a tio n f o r ju di c i al rev i ew was f ile d w it h t h e c o urt o n 15 No vember 2016. I t c o n cer n s a 25 y ear o l d f e ma l e (� th e a ppli ca nt � ) . T h e a ppl ica n t i s a c i t i zen o f N e p a l.
(i) O n 6 O c to ber 2009 t h e a ppli ca n t arr i ved i n th e U nit ed Kingd o m o n a s t u d e n t v i sa. S h e was acc o m p a ni ed by h er t hen h usba n d who t rave ll ed w it h h er as a d e p e nd e nt.
(ii) T h e h usb a nd , i t i s a s ser t e d , ab a ndon ed the a ppli ca n t o n arr i val i n t he U nit ed Ki n gdo m. L ater i n Au gu st 2013 th e c o u pl e divo rce d.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.