Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr N. Wraith (instructed by The Crown Prosecution Service ) for the Prosecution Mr R. Linford (instructed by Hansell Drew & Co) for the Defendant Hearing dates : 17 February 2011 ____________________
The court then identified a significant number of such passages. At paragraph 34 the court expressed particular concern about the questions put in the course of examination in chief, saying that a judge should be particularly careful about refraining from intervening during a witness's evidence in chief because, however improbable the appellant's story might have been, he was entitled to explain it to the jury without being subjected to "sniper fire" in the course of so doing.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.