Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Respect for family life • Unjustified deprivation of parental responsibilities and authorisation for daughter to be adopted by her foster parents • Insufficient importance attached to the aim that placement in care be temporary and for an affected family to be reunited • Insufficient regard to the positive duty to take measures to reasonably preserve family bonds • Dialogue with Supreme Court and application of Strand Lobben
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� S�ofra O�Leary, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen, ��������� Mattias Guyomar, judges, and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 64639/16 ) against the Kingdom of Norway lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Norwegian national, Ms M.L. (�the applicant�), on 27 October 2016;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.