Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Nicholas Goodwin KC and Chloe Wilkins, instructed by Jackson West solicitors for the Respondent �
      M is a happy, healthy boy of twenty months old.� He was placed in the care of the prospective adopters when he was a day old.� They have devoted themselves to him since the day he came to live with them, giving him loving, consistent, attentive care.� He is thriving.� They love him, and long for his place in their family to be secured by an adoption order.�
      M's mother C was twenty-one when she gave birth to him.� At the time she was not in a relationship with the birth father.� She had discovered her pregnancy at thirty-one weeks.� Placing M with the prospective adopters was an incredibly difficult and painful decision to make, but was made because she believed this was best for M.
      C did not wish the birth father to know of the pregnancy, of M's birth, or to have any say in the decisions she made for M.�
      C says she was supported in her decision not to tell the birth father about M by social workers, who told her that the decision was hers to make, she did not have to disclose the birth father's identity, and her wish for confidentiality would be respected.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.