Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1]������� The late Charles Haughey, formerly Taoiseach, when describing an unusual set of circumstances coined the acronym GUBU; standing for Grotesque, Unbelievable, Bizarre and Unprecedented.� That acronym could apply to this particular case.
[2]������� It is in short the most unusual, by some distance, ancillary relief application that I have heard since I started hearing such applications in 1996.�
[3]������� Amongst the more singular features of the case, and not in any particular order, are as follows:-
1.���� The husband alleged that the parties had been in a brief relationship for some months, eighteen years prior to the marriage, that some considerable time later they had got together again, been married, lived together for a short period of months after which time they separated and divorced.�
2.���� It was the case of the wife that they had been in a committed, cohabiting, relationship throughout that time amounting to a period in excess of twenty years.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.