Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  I do not consider it relevant that the State may have previously decided to indemnify an appellant and find that to be of no binding or persuasive authority on this Court.
                  Therefore, I do not consider this application satisfies the very high threshold required for a costs order in favour of an unsuccessful applicant. However, I do consider it reaches the threshold for a no costs order having regard to the novel nature of the application made and the fact that the applicants were motivated by a concern for other people who might find themselves in a situation similar to that in which the applicants found themselves at the time these proceedings were instituted.
                  I therefore make no order as to costs.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.