Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark V4 Financial Partners - Earlier national figurative mark V4 - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 )
V4 Holding, a.s., established in Čadca (Slovakia), represented by M. Michalec, lawyer,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by R. Raponi, acting as Agent,
composed, at the time of the deliberations, of P. Škvařilová-Pelzl, President, G. Steinfatt (Rapporteur) and R. Meyer, Judges,
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, V4 Holding, a.s., seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 March 2024 (Case R 2203/2022‑4) ('the contested decision').
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.