Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Arts 14 and 1 P 1 • Discrimination • Possessions • Reduction of benefit in order to incentivise social housing tenants to move into smaller accommodation • No distinction made in favour of certain categories of vulnerable tenants • Disability • Gender • Margin of appreciation • Proportionality • Test to be applied as regards the justification for a measure of social and economic policy
This judgment has become final under Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Ksenija Turković, President, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Ale� Pejchal, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, judges, ��������� Leeona June Dorrian, ad hoc judge, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar,
The case originated in two applications (nos. 32949/17 and 34614/17 against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by two British nationals, J.D. and A (�the applicants�), on 27 April 2017 and 5 May 2017 respectively. The President of the Section acceded to the applicants� request not to have their names disclosed (Rule 47 � 4 of the Rules of Court).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.