Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Josep Casadevall, President, ��������� Egbert Myjer, ��������� Corneliu B�rsan, ��������� Alvina Gyulumyan, ��������� J�n �ikuta, ��������� Luis L�pez Guerra, ��������� Nona Tsotsoria, judges, and Santiago Quesada , Section Registrar,
The Constitutional Court held that an appeal on points of law was a remedy that was available to the applicants, and observed that they had in fact used it (see paragraph 19 above). As it was still pending, that part of their constitutional complaint was premature.
The written version of the Constitutional Court�s decision was served on the applicants� lawyer on 25 January 2008.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.