Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Counsel for the Applicant: MR T AMOS QC Counsel for the Respondent: MR J SOUTHGATE QC and MR N CHAPMAN ____________________
Transcribed from the Official Tape Recording by Apple Transcription Limited Suite 204, Kingfisher Business Centre, Burnley Road, Rawtenstall, Lancashire BB4 8ES DX: 26258 Rawtenstall � Telephone: 0845 604 5642 � Fax: 01706 870838
Paragraph (2) provides for automatic upwards variation in accordance with the index of retail prices from the date of payment, due from 1 st April 2000.
Strike out may also fall within rule 4.4(1)(b) where it cannot be justified, for example, where it is, "...frivolous, scurrilous or obviously ill-founded."
Section 1(a) does not apply and subsection 3 has been repealed. Paragraph 2 provides:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.