Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The father and the mother are the parents of Michael (this is not his real name) born in 2010.
The father has parental responsibility for Michael and the mother has residence of Michael by an order made by consent on the 23 rd June, 2010. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order were in the following terms:-
"3. by consent, the Respondent mother shall have residence of the child and the child shall continue to reside with her in Jersey until further agreement between the parties or order of the Court;
neither party shall remove the child permanently from the jurisdiction without the consent in writing of the other, or order of the Court and the Applicant father shall not remove the child from the jurisdiction at all without the express consent in writing of the respondent mother or further order of the Court;"
The order contained the usual warning at the end of the order that neither party was entitled to take Michael from Jersey for a period of more than one month without the written consent of the other or leave of the Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.