Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen, President, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Mattias Guyomar, judges, and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 66362/11 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by an Ukrainian national, Mr Andrey Vasilyevich Kartashov (�the applicant�), on 14 October 2011;
the decision to give notice to the Ukrainian Government (�the Government�) of the complaint under Article 6 �� 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the applicant�s inability to examine at his retrial the victims of the offence of which he was convicted and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application;
The applicant alleged that, while the victims of the crime of which he had been convicted had been examined in the course of his original trial, following the quashing of his conviction on appeal he had not been allowed to examine those victims again in the course of the retrial conducted before a different trial judge, who eventually convicted him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.