Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Andr� Potocki, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Lәtif H�seynov, judges, and Anne-Marie Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,
The case originated in an application (no. 43104/04 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by three Ukrainian nationals, Mr Mykola Vasylyovych Nedilenko, Mrs Oksana Vasylivna Zagarovska and Mrs Mariya Volodymyrivna Pylypchuk (�the applicants�), on 25 November 2004.
The applicants, who had been granted legal aid, were represented by Mr O. Tarakhkalo and Ms O. Protsenko, lawyers practising in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agents, most recently, Mr I. Lishchyna from the Ministry of Justice.
The applicants complained, in particular, about allegedly arbitrary and unreasonable searches of their flats and a lack of effective remedies in respect of their complaints. The first applicant also complained about the allegedly unlawful and unreasonable seizure and retention of his belongings, a lack of effective remedies in respect of that complaint and of the lengthy non-enforcement of a court judgment in his favour.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.