Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The first plea, alleging, in essence, infringement of the rule that the parties have the right to be heard, with regard to the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure
The part of the third plea alleging infringement of the rule that the parties have the right to be heard
The plea alleging failure to state adequate reasons in so far as the Commission did not take account of the fact that there exists in the Italian legal system a measure with the same characteristics as the measures at issue
The plea alleging that the contested decision fails to state adequate reasons with regard to the selective nature of the measures at issue
The plea alleging that adequate reasons are not stated in the contested decision as regards the effect of the measures at issue on competition and intra'Community trade
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.