Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The claimant did not appear at the hearing of his appeal but Mr Duffy of the Royal British Legion appeared on his behalf.� So far as is material, the First-tier Tribunal�s statement of reasons says �
�6. � the Tribunal decided that it was fair to continue [in the claimant�s] absence:
� Proper notice of hearing was given and no satisfactory explanation for absence is provided.
� The Tribunal decided that in all the circumstances it was not in the interest of justice to adjourn.
� Having considered and assessed the evidence before it the Tribunal finds the following material facts:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.