Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Outside activity — Manifest error of assessment — Claim for damages)
European Parliament, represented by Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, acting as Agents,
concerning, first, an application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 24 June 2016 terminating the applicant’s contract of employment as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, an application for damages for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant,
composed of S. Gervasoni, President, L. Madise (Rapporteur) and R. da Silva Passos, Judges,
On 22 May 2014, the applicant, L, was recruited by the European Parliament on request from a Member of the Parliament (‘the MEP’). He was employed as an accredited parliamentary assistant (‘APA’) to that MEP, under a contract covering the years 2014 to 2019.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.