Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1] The complainer in this Bill of Suspension seeks the suspension of a warrant for his arrest, which was granted on 21 May 2012. The complainer was and remains a child. He is presently, aged 15 and he was charged with wilful fire raising along with three other juveniles and was released from police custody on an undertaking signed by his father, to attend Paisley Sheriff Court on 17 May 2012.
[7] These features, we consider, amount to oppression and we consider that clear prejudice has been suffered by the complainer as a result. It is because of these features and not solely because of what the administrative assistant said on 11 May that we are persuaded that oppression has been made out and accordingly we shall grant the bill and suspend the warrant simpliciter .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.