Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark G CORE - Earlier EU word mark CORE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law )
G-Core Innovations Sàrl, established in Contern (Luxembourg), represented by L. Karnøe Søndergaard, lawyer,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being
Coretransform GmbH, established in Berlin (Germany), represented by U. Hildebrandt, lawyer,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.