Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Up- to-date position on propensity to re-offend at time of 2016 Review .. - 40 -
The inference which was drawn from the appellant�s return to home state . - 44 -
2nd Issue: The right to an effective remedy under Article 47 of CFREU and compliance with Articles 30 and 31 of the Citizens� Rights Directive. - 49 -
The substantive legislative provisions which form the relevant background to this appeal are the provisions of the Directive 2004\38\EC of the EU Parliament and of the Council on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (� the 2004 Citizens� Rights Directive �).� Article 6 provides for a right of residence for up to three months, while Article 7 deals with the right of residence for more than three months.�
Chapter VI concerns �restrictions on the right of entry and right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health�. Article 27 (1) and (2) provide:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.