Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Anja Seibert-Fohr, judges, and Victor Soloveytchik, Deputy Section Registrar,
the applications (nos. 19095/12 , 73451/13, 16561/16, 19635/16 and 44349/16 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by five Ukrainian nationals, Mr Igor Borisovich Zavadskiy (�the first applicant�), Mr Oleksandr Vasylyovych Tymchenko (�the second applicant�), Mr Mykola Ivanovych Dubyna (�the third applicant�), Mr Oleksandr Mykolayovych Dubyna (�the fourth applicant�) and Mr Yevgen Yuriyovych Shugaliy (�the fifth applicant�), on the various dates indicated in the appended table;
the decision to give notice to the Ukrainian Government (�the Government�) of the complaints under Article 5 �� 3 and 5 of the Convention, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
The case concerns the alleged lack of reasoning of the judicial decisions ordering the applicants� arrest and continued detention, the allegedly unreasonable duration of their detention on remand and the alleged absence of a right to compensation for the alleged violations of their Article 5 rights.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.