Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT MR JUSTICE OUSELEY T20067 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 05/10/2010 B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE HUGHES VICE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS and MRS JUSTICE THIRLWALL DBE ____________________
Mr. G.R. Robertson QC and Miss K. Brimelow (instructed by Janes) for the Appellant Mr. M. Ellison QC and Miss B. Cheema (instructed by Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown Hearing dates : 5th, 6th, and 7th May 2010 ____________________
IMPORTANT: SEE PARAGRAPH 62 AND THE RESTRICTION ON PUBLICITY SET OUT AT THE END OF THIS JUDGMENT. HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT ____________________
Those words were also included in written directions supplied to the jury. At that stage there was no emphasis of the need for acquittal on counts 2 and 3, and given the number of counts on which directions had to be given and the relative unimportance of count 4, that is not surprising.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.