Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights, taking its decision in plenary session pursuant to Rule 50 of the Rules of Court and composed of the following judges:
and also of Mr. M.-A. Eissen , Registrar , and Mr. H. Petzold , Deputy Registrar ,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date, on the application in the present case of Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention"):
1.����� The case was referred to the Court on 28 January 1986 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission").� It originated in an application (no. 10496/83) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission in 1983 by a British citizen.
The only outstanding matter to be settled is the question of the application of Article 50 (art. 50) in the present case.� Accordingly, as regards the facts, reference should be made to paragraphs 8-58 of the principal judgment (ibid., pp. 107-115).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.