Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Digital Transcription by Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd., 2nd Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP. Telephone No: 020 7067 2900. DX 410 LDE Email: [email protected] Web: www.martenwalshcherer.com
Mr Steven Reed (instructed by Eversheds Sutherland) for the Applicant Mr Henry Mainwaring for the Respondent ____________________
(1) The court's power to grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain foreign proceedings, when brought or threatened to be brought in breach of a binding agreement to refer disputes to arbitration, is derived from section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act. It will do so when it is just and convenient.
(3) The jurisdiction to grant an anti-suit injunction should be exercised with caution.
(4) The injunction applicant must establish, with a high degree of probability, that there is an arbitration or jurisdiction agreement which governs the dispute in question.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.