Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Trade marks - Approximation of laws - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(a) - Notion of sign which is identical with the trade mark - Use of the distinctive element of the mark to the exclusion of other elements - Use of all the elements making up the trade mark but with the addition of other elements)
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between LTJ Diffusion SA
on the interpretation of Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1), THE COURT,
composed of: G.C. Rodr�guez Iglesias, President, M. Wathelet and R. Schintgen (Presidents of Chambers), C. Gulmann, P. Jann, F. Macken (Rapporteur), N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges, Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs, Registrar: D. Louterman-Hubeau, Head of Division,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of: - LTJ Diffusion SA, by F. Fajgenbaum, avocat, - Sadas Vertbaudet SA, by A. Bertrand, avocat, - the United Kingdom Government, by G. Amodeo, acting as Agent, and D. Alexander, barrister, - the Commission of the European Communities, by K. Banks, acting as Agent, having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.