Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Ganna Yudkivska, President, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Egidijus Kūris, Iulia Motoc, Georges Ravarani, Marko Bošnjak, Péter Paczolay, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 20487/13 ) against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by a Hungarian national, Ms Katalin Fatime Faludy-Kovács ("the applicant"), on 16 March 2013.
The applicant was represented by Mr B. Karkosák, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government ("the Government") were represented by Mr Z. Tallódi, Agent at the Ministry of Justice.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.