What is the ratio in S and Marper v UK?

The ratio is that indefinite retention of DNA profiles and fingerprints of unconvicted persons constitutes a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights and discriminates against them under Article 14.

What did the court decide in S and Marper v UK?

The European Court of Human Rights found violations of Articles 8 and 14, ruling that indefinite retention of biometric data from unconvicted persons was disproportionate and discriminatory.

Why is S and Marper v UK important for privacy law?

It established crucial principles about biometric data protection and police retention powers, influencing UK legislation and broader European data protection frameworks including GDPR.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library