Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Social security – Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 – Article 1(r) – Definition of ‘periods of insurance’ – Article 46 – Calculation of retirement pension – Periods of insurance to be taken into consideration – Frontier workers – Period of incapacity for work – Aggregation of similar benefits paid by two Member States – No account taken of a period of incapacity for work as a period of insurance – Residence requirement – Nation rules precluding the cumulation of benefits)
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium), made by decision of 27 October 2011, received at the Court on 31 October 2011, in the proceedings
composed of M. Ilešič, President of the Chamber, E. Jarašiūnas, A. Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur), C. Toader and C.G. Fernlund, Judges,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 1(r) and 46 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 (OJ 1997 L 28, p. 1) (‘Regulation No 1408/71’).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.