Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the second to fourth appellants are granted anonymity as minor children.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the second to fourth appellants likely to lead members of the public to identify those appellants. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The appellants are Eainaas Alyounis (the first appellant) and her three children (the second, third and fourth appellants), all are nationals of Syria. They appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decisions of the Entry Clearance Officer dated 4 November 2021 to refuse their applications for entry clearance to join the first appellant's brothers in the UK.
              First-tier Tribunal Feeney dismissed the appeals in a decision dated 24 February 2023. The appellants appealed to the Upper Tribunal and the panel found that there was an error of law in the First-tier Tribunal's decision and set the decision aside to be remade in the Upper Tribunal. Thus the appeal came before us.
              The hearing took place in Field House. The appellants' sponsor and both representatives attended in person. The appellants remain in Syria and did not attend.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.