Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 2(2)(a) - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Mandatory retirement age - National legislation precluding any postponement of the retirement of federal judges - Possibility for federal civil servants and Land judges to request the postponement of retirement - Difference in treatment on grounds of membership of a socio-professional category or place of work )
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe (Administrative Court, Karlsruhe, Germany), made by decision of 24 April 2023, received at the Court on 6 June 2023, in the proceedings
composed of F. Biltgen (Rapporteur), President of the First Chamber, acting as President of the Second Chamber, M.L. Arastey Sahún, President of the Fifth Chamber, and J. Passer, Judge,
- the German Government, by J. Möller, W. Ewer and M. Hellmann, acting as Agents,
- the European Commission, by T.S. Bohr, F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and E.E. Schmidt, acting as Agents,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.