Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant in this matter is referred to as the 'Secretary of State' in the body of this decision, the respondent as the 'claimant'.
This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Hanbury ('the Judge') sent to the parties on 20 November 2020. The Judge allowed the claimant's appeal against a decision of the respondent to cancel his refugee status.
The respondent appeals with permission of Upper Tribunal Judge Martin by means of a decision dated 15 December 2020.
I observe that this appeal is concerned with the cancellation of refugee status. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that it is presently in the interests of justice that the claimant is not publicly recognised as someone who has secured international protection and is challenging a subsequent decision to cancel refugee status. In reaching such conclusion and being mindful of the right to information protected by article 10 ECHR I observe paragraph 13 of Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber Guidance Note 2013 No 1: Anonymity Orders.
I therefore grant the claimant anonymity and my order is detailed at the conclusion of this decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.