Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 (civil) • Access to a court • Refusal by the administrative authorities to execute interim orders ordering the State to provide urgent accommodation for asylum seekers and their children • Art 6 � 1 applicable to the granting and refusal of a place in emergency accommodation constituting a civil right • Complete passivity of the administrative authorities despite the fact that the orders were the result of an emergency procedure • Care of applicants only following interim measures pronounced by the European Court
This judgment will become final under the conditions laid down in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may undergo retouching of forme.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting in a Chamber composed of:
the applications (Nos . 34349/18, 34638/18 and 35047/18) directed against the French Republic and brought before the Court by Congolese nationals (M.K. and others and A.D. and others) ("the applicants") on the dates indicated in the annexed table,
the decision to bring to the attention of the French Government ("the Government") complaints concerning Articles 3, 6 � 1 and 13 of the Convention,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.