Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 3 (substantive) • Degrading treatment • Living conditions in R�szke transit zone exceeding threshold of severity for repeat asylum-seeker unable to obtain sufficient food, a vulnerable pregnant woman and children, in light of the extended duration of confinement for nearly four months
Art 5 �� 1 and 4 • Unlawful de facto detention in transit zone based on overly-broad interpretation of legal provisions and in the absence of any formal, reasoned decision • Stay constituting a de facto deprivation of liberty in light of duration and living conditions of confinement, lack of time-limits, and extent of restriction to free movement • Inability to seek judicial review of the lawfulness of detention
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Yonko Grozev, President, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Carlo Ranzoni, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, ��������� Georges Ravarani, ��������� Jolien Schukking, ��������� P�ter Paczolay, judges, and Ilse Freiwirth, Deputy Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.