Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms S Simpson KC with Ms L Murphy BL (instructed by the Directorate of Legal Services) for the Trust
Mr H Toner KC with Ms E Ryan BL (instructed by Brendan Kearney & Co solicitors) for both parents
Mr G McGuigan QC with Ms C McCloskey BL (instructed by Quigley, Grant & Kyle solicitors) for the guardian ad litem on behalf of the child
[1]������� This judgment has been anonymised to protect the identity of the child. �I have used the cipher RH for the name of the child.� These are not her initials.� She has an older half-sister who I will call NG and a younger full sister who I will call GA.� Nothing can be published that will identify any of the children.
[3]������� The father has an older child by another woman.� NG was born in 2006 and was made the subject of a care order with a care plan of long-term foster placement.� The decision of O�Hara J in Re: Rose (unreported 3 October 2019) sets out the background.� It is not necessary to rehearse the contents of that judgment, however the role of the Trust, and in particular the role of a social worker employed by the Trust, has become a long-running sore for the father and it has infected his approach to RH�s (and GA�s) case.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.