Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr A Waterman KC, Mr W Tyzack and Mr G Hogan (instructed by Vaitilingam Kay Solicitors ) for the Applicant
Ms L Stone KC and Mr M Lazarides (instructed by Family Law in Partnership Ltd ) for the 1 st Respondent
Mr R Todd KC and Mr E Benson ( instructed by Bivonas Law ) for the 2 nd Respondent
                  In financial remedy proceedings brought by the husband (�H�) against the wife (�W�) an issue has arisen as to the beneficial ownership of Flats 1 & 2, 30 DS, London (�30 DS�), compendiously at times called by me �the new flat�, the two flats comprising one premises.
                  It is the case of H that the premises belong both legally and beneficially to W, in whose name the flats are registered.� It is the case of W and her brother (�B�) that the flats are beneficially owned by B.� Accordingly, B has been joined to these proceedings as 2 nd Respondent.� As it is B�s case that he is the beneficial owner, he has been treated as the applicant in these proceedings.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.