Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
UPON hearing the Claimant/Respondent and the Applicant/Defendant at the Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Hearing on 7 June 2018;
AND UPON reading the submissions and evidence filed and recorded on the Court Court file;
The DIFC Courts DIFC Courts do not have jurisdiction to hear this dispute. The case is therefore dismissed.
The Claimant/Respondent is Ishtar (formerly Ishtar Advocates & Legal Consultants) (hereafter the “Claimant”), a law firm operating and registered in on-shore Dubai. The Claimant has filed a claim against the Defendant for the recovery of legal fees allegedly owed by the Defendant.
The Applicant/Defendant is Iniko (hereafter the “Defendant”), an individual who engaged the services of the Claimant law firm regarding her divorce in on-shore Dubai.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.