Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.���� This is a claimant's application for leave to appeal from the decision of an appeal tribunal with reference BE/13561/22/02/D.
2.���� For the reasons I give below, I grant leave to appeal. �I set aside the decision of the appeal tribunal under Article 15(7) of the Social Security (NI) Order 1998 without a formal finding that the tribunal has erred in law. �I refer the appeal to a newly constituted tribunal for determination.
5.���� The applicant, represented by Ms Corr of Law Centre NI, submits that the tribunal has erred in law by failing to take into account and/or resolve conflicts of fact or opinion on material matters in respect of daily living activities 1, 6, 9 and mobility activity 1.
6.���� The Department was invited to make observations on the applicant's grounds. �Mr Clements of Decision Making Services (DMS) responded on behalf of the Department. �Mr Clements accepted that the tribunal had materially erred in law. �He indicated that the Department supported the application on the basis of the ground identified in respect of activity 9.
7.���� The applicant's representative duly responded to the Department's observations and, when it was subsequently invited to respond, the Department in turn was content to rely upon its initial observations.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.