Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The principal judgment herein was delivered on the 5 th March, 2021 allowing the plaintiff�s appeal and dismissing the defendant�s cross-appeal.� In the concluding section of the judgment, the court provisionally indicated its view that as the plaintiff had been successful in the appeal, she should be entitled, as an unrepresented party, to her reasonable expenses in the matter and also to her costs of the High Court while she was legally represented, such costs to be adjudicated on the basis of the award of this court.
��Accordingly, it would not be appropriate for this court to make any further order in this matter beyond the costs order proposed in the principal judgment and the orders sought by H. J. Ward and Company.
Result: It would not be appropriate for the court to make any further order in this matter beyond the costs order proposed in the principal Judgment and orders sought be Solicitor
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.