Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             For ease of reference, I will refer to the appellant before the First-tier Tribunal as "the appellant".
             The appellant has been accepted to be a victim of human trafficking by the Single Competent Authority ("the SCA"). He also reports having been a victim of a sexual assault. Victims of trafficking and sexual offences are entitled to anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992. I consider that it is necessary to make an order for anonymity in order to ensure this decision does not reveal details which could lead to a breach of the statutory anonymity enjoyed by the appellant.
             The appellant is a citizen of Jamaica. He was born in 1996. He arrived in the United Kingdom when he was five years old, in 2001. He is currently in a relationship with a British woman, S, and together they have a daughter, T, who was born in March 2021.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.