Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Secretary of State unlawfully fettered or abdicated his discretion in relation to his recommendations to the Queen;
The decision not to recommend Mr O'Rourke for appointment was irrational in substance or because of a failure to take into account relevant considerations; and
Given the circumstances of his application, Mr O'Rourke had a legitimate expectation that he would be called for interview by the panel.
The lack of opportunity to make representations to the Secretary of State and fettering of discretion
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.