Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Respect for private life • Positive obligations • Requirement to enter full divorce settlement containing personal data into the public land register for property transfer within the ambit of Art 8 • Domestic courts� failure to comply with procedural obligation to conduct a comprehensive assessment of requirement�s compatibility with effective enjoyment of applicant�s privacy rights and to address Convention issue at stake
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Yonko Grozev, President, ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Armen Harutyunyan, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 5434/17 ) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by an Austrian national, Mr Christoph-Herwig Liebscher (�the applicant�), on 11 January 2017;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.